Essay Final Example

Essay Final Example Essay Final – Essay Example Same-Sex Marriage Same-sex marriage is a relationship that involves marriage between a man and a man or between a woman and another woman. Same-sex marriages have been way of life for a long time. However, this issue had not developed an interest until the recent years. In the contemporary society, same-sex marriages have picked noteworthy interest thus creating a platform for discussions worldwide on whether they should be legal or against the law. Same sex marriages are perhaps viewed as having more adverse impacts than affirmative results and consequently they ought to be illegalized. Same-sex marriages weakened the by now relatively weak union foundation and changing its procreative purpose. This is because these forms of marriages only seem to rise an already existing societal problem. With the inability of the same sex to reproduce, thereby same-sex marriages do not assist in advancing the human race. Moreover, same-sex marriages are seemingly selfish since they are more focuse d on interests of adults leaving children out of the picture. People in support of same-sex marriages may argue that adopting children may solve the problem of procreation, as is the way of many same-sex marriages. Same sex marriages are in contrast with cultural practices and beliefs of most religions (Hunter 54).Over the years, many cultures have based the family setting of specialization and division of labor. Each gender is allocated a set of activities that are connected to a particular sex and absence of one sex implies neglecting some of the roles stipulated for the particular gender missing. Despite the arguably few advantages that accompany same-sex marriages, there are other options that can be adopted to amount to the same results. For example, there are increasingly many laws protecting people from all types of discrimination including those relating to marriage. Furthermore, same-sex marriages do not offer the best environment for children development due to the absence of fathers and mothers who both have an important role to play in the children development process. In addition, same-sex marriages are a source of confusion and depletion of cultural and religious beliefs. Therefore, it is in order to conclude that same-sex marriages should be discouraged and illegalized ( Hunter 45).Hunter, Dan. The Future Impact of Same-Sex Marriage: More Questions than Answers. Georgetown University Law Center, 2012.

Suffixes That Denote Relation or Resemblance

Suffixes That Denote Relation or Resemblance Suffixes That Denote Relation or Resemblance Suffixes That Denote Relation or Resemblance By Mark Nichol When we refer to something suggestive of William Shakespeare’s works, why do we write Shakespearean (or, seldom, Shakespearian) rather than Shakespearesque? Why is an epic tale labeled Homeric rather than Homerian? What’s the difference between Christian and Christ-like? Is there a method to the madness of these suffixes? The transformation of surnames into adjectives is fairly random, and writers are strongly advised to consult a dictionary or to research online usage rather than rely on common sense. When such a suffix has not yet been bestowed on a name, audition the four forms (-ean, -esque, -ian, and -ic) and select the most euphonious among them, but only after considering whether it’s wise to use any of the options at all, rather than to simply state that something is reminiscent of the works or beliefs of a particular person. It takes a significant achievement or, more likely, set of achievements to merit this form, and your attempt to honor someone may be interpreted as irony. The good news, however, is that attaching one of these suffixes to a person’s name is, in a satirical context, an effective form of mockery or parody. (Consider, for example, a reference to a vocalist’s Bieberesque stylings. But beware of clumsy constructions like Kardashianian.) In sincere usage, reserve -esque for the most deserving recipient names, as with Lincolnesque. The suffixes -ean and -ian the former form dominates, though the choice often seems arbitrary is suitable for most other references (Sartrean, Freudian). The -ic option is most suitable for classical (Platonic) or historical (Napoleonic) references. And note the conversion of names ending in vowel sounds: Themes suggestive of George Bernard Shaw’s philosophy or the tone of his work, for example, are called Shavian, and a worldview akin to that of Henry David Thoreau is Thoreauvian. The seemingly most sensible alternative to simply append -like to a name is rarely employed; the only widespread example that comes to mind is in the distinction between reference to Christian theology or values and to Christ-like behavior or appearance. (The suffix -like is usually attached to a root word without hyphenation, but an exception is made for proper nouns.) Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Spelling category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Has vs. HadConnotations of 35 Words for Funny People5 Examples of Insufficient Hyphenation